Epistemically Suspect Beliefs can be partly explained by individual's propensity towards contradiction
نویسنده
چکیده
Studies on epistemically suspect beliefs (ESB) have suggested that individual’s analytic cognition suppresses unwarranted beliefs, however, our previous studies also showed that an inhibitory effect of analytic cognition was higher among Westerners than Easterners. Rather, intuitive cognition was a common predictor of beliefs between two cultures. Among several cultural differences in cognitive style, we suspect that tendency towards dialectic thinking, i.e., tolerance for contradiction may contribute cultural differences on ESB. The present study aimed to explore this possibility and investigated the association between beliefs and other cognitive measures including individual’s cognitive abilities, thinking dispositions, personality traits and propensity towards dialectic thinking. The results showed that the ESB resulted from our intuitive cognition for the most part, and that the effect of culture diminished whilst controlling individual’s tendency towards dialectic thinking and style of causal cognition. The cultural difference in a relationship between beliefs and cognitive style was discussed.
منابع مشابه
Perceptual Belief and Nonexperiential Looks
How things look (or sound, taste, smell, etc.) plays two important roles in the epistemology of perception. 1 First, our perceptual beliefs are episte-mically justified, at least in part, in virtue of how things look. Second, whether a given belief is a perceptual belief, as opposed to, say, an infer-ential belief, is also at least partly a matter of how things look. Together, these yield an ep...
متن کاملDeveloping a Theoretical Model of Clinician Information Usage Propensity
Based on qualitative research, we developed the theoretical construct "clinician information usage propensity" as a hypothetical indicator of attitudes and behaviour towards clinical information and systems. We devised a survey to validate the construct and had 146 responses. Principal components analysis extracted four factors accounting for 47.2% of the variance: beliefs about clinical judgem...
متن کاملJustifying conditionalization: Conditionalization maximizes expected epistemic utility
According to Bayesian epistemology, the epistemically rational agent updates her beliefs by conditionalization: that is, her posterior subjective probability after taking account of evidence X, pnew, is to be set equal to her prior conditional probability pold(·/X). Bayesians can be challenged to provide a justification for their claim that conditionalization is recommended by rationality — whe...
متن کاملJustifying conditionalisation: conditionalisation maximizes expected epistemic utility
According to Bayesian epistemology, the epistemically rational agent updates her beliefs by conditionalisation: that is, her posterior subjective probability after taking account of evidence X, pnew, is to be set equal to her prior conditional probability pold(·|X). Bayesians can be challenged to provide a justification for their claim that conditionalisation is recommended by rationality — whe...
متن کاملThe epistemic significance of experience
According to orthodoxy, perceptual beliefs are caused by perceptual experiences. The paper argues that this view makes it impossible to explain how experiences can be epistemically significant. A rival account, on which experiences in the ‘‘good case’’ are ways of knowing, is set out and defended.
متن کامل